CAP says that unless it is already apparent from context, clear ad disclosure is important regardless of the age of the audience, but when young children (under-12s) are the primary audience for an ad, it is important to consider whether more enhanced disclosure may be required.

• Ad disclosure in online spaces: Section 2 of the CAP Code covers this fundamental issue, with rule 2.1 stating that ads must be “obviously identifiable as such”; what makes an ad obviously identifiable will vary depending on the medium and where it appears; in the context of integrated online display and “native” advertising this could mean including a label, like “advertisement”, to indicate that the section the user is about to engage with is an ad rather a piece of editorial content;
• Background: when advertising to young children in online spaces, a label might not be sufficient; CAP guidance notes that younger children pose a particular challenge to marketers; cognitive development is in its early stages, meaning they sometimes cannot recognise more integrated online marketing communications; CAP therefore expects advertisers to go above and beyond to ensure any advertising aimed at young children in these online spaces is clearly differentiated as such;
• Fonts and graphics: the ASA has ruled that an ad targeted at young children that used the label “advertisement” was still misleading as it was only slightly larger and appeared in a similar colour pallet to the surrounding editorial content; the disclosure was “not sufficiently prominent or interruptive enough for younger children”; including the name and logo of the brand in the ad may also not be sufficient; the ASA has also ruled on an ad which saw the inclusion of the name and logo of the marketer within the ad graphic, but it was considered too integrated in its colour and placement to serve as an appropriate disclosure;
• Page formatting: the layout of the page is an important consideration when assessing the context in which an ad is appearing; the ASA has ruled on an ad for failing to appropriately differentiate the ad with the surroundings after it appeared in a tile on a website which was split up into identically formatted tiles; this was considered as having a high level of integration with the website; combined with concerns about the size, colour and font of the disclosure label, this ad was found to have broken the rules; and
• Enhanced disclosure: if an ad is: (i) aimed at young children (under-12s); (ii) highly immersive or significantly integrated into the surrounding editorial content; and (iii) unlikely to be identified clearly from the context in which it appears, it is likely to require enhanced disclosure; enhanced disclosure should be prominent, interruptive, and sufficient to identify the marketer and the commercial intent of the ad.

To read the advice note in full and for links to the relevant ASA rulings, click here.