December 21, 2020
As the Law Commission explains, a smart contract is a legally binding contract in which some or all of the contractual obligations are recorded in or performed automatically by a computer program deployed on a distributed ledger.
The Law Commission says that the growing use of smart contract technology is expected to increase efficiency and certainty in business, and reduce the need for contracting parties to have to trust each other; instead the trust resides in the code. However, there are questions about the circumstances in which a smart contract will be legally binding, how smart contracts are to be interpreted, how vitiating factors such as mistake can apply to smart contracts, and the remedies available where the smart contract does not perform as intended.
The responses to the call for evidence will inform the Law Commission’s scoping study on smart contracts, which will provide an accessible account of the current law and set out how it will, or may, apply to smart contracts. The project is intended to inform public debate and seek a consensus about where reform may be needed to create an environment that encourages the use of this technology.
To inform the scoping study, the Law Commission is asking for evidence and views on a range of issues relating to smart contracts, including:
- the definition of smart contracts, how smart contracts are being or might be used, and the potential benefits and costs associated with the use of smart contracts;
- the formation of smart contracts, including the use of distributed ledger technology to conclude agreements, the intention of the parties to enter into legal relations, and the ability to satisfy statutory “in writing” and “signature” requirements;
- the interpretation of smart contracts, including how the coded terms of a smart contract are to be interpreted by the courts and the role of expert coders in the interpretation exercise;
- the remedies that might be awarded where a smart contract is vitiated (that is, rendered defective for example due to mistake, misrepresentation, duress or undue influence), the code is incorrectly recorded or the code does not perform as the parties expected;
- consumer protection issues that might arise when non-code-literate parties enter into smart contracts, and how existing consumer protections might apply in the smart contracts context; and
- jurisdiction issues, including the factors which may determine whether the UK courts have jurisdiction in relation to a smart contract which does not contain a jurisdiction clause.
The call for evidence is open until 31 March 2021. The Law Commission aims to publish a scoping study in late 2021. To read the Law Commission’s press release in full and for a link to the call for evidence, click here.