HomeInsightsPress Recognition Panel publishes first annual report on the recognition system saying that “Urgent action is required”.

The Press Recognition Panel (PRP) was established by Royal Charter to independently oversee press regulation in the UK.  The charter was granted following the Leveson inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the press.

The PRP explains that Lord Justice Leveson’s recommendation for a genuinely independent and effective system of self-regulation led to the framing of the 29 recognition criteria as part of a scheme of recognition within the Charter.  That scheme of recognition sits within the recognition system that strikes the balance between the freedom of the press and securing the public interest.

Although the Charter applies to the UK, press regulation is a devolved matter.  In England and Wales, the recognition system includes the arrangements put in place by the Charter as well as provisions in the Crime and Courts Act 2013.  The provisions relating to exemplary damages came into force automatically on 3 November 2015, whereas the cost shifting provisions have not yet been brought into force.  This means that in England and Wales, the recognition system is not yet in place as contemplated.

In Scotland or Northern Ireland, there are no equivalent linked statutory provisions, so there is no recognition system.

Until the recognition system is fully in place, the PRP says that it cannot judge its success or failure.  Success would occur “when all or most significant relevant publishers were members of one or more recognised regulators”, the PRP says.  There are currently no recognised regulators, so it follows that the system of regulation does not cover all significant relevant publishers.

IMPRESS, has applied for recognition, and the PRP is currently assessing its application.  IMPRESS has 14 member publishers that produce 25 publications, so even if IMPRESS is successful in its application, that will still leave the majority of significant relevant publishers outside the recognition system.

Urgent action is required if the post-Leveson system of independent self-regulation is to be given a chance to succeed”, the PRP says.  “The public interest embodied in the Charter cannot be safeguarded until the recognition system is given the opportunity to function”.

The PRP recommends that in England and Wales the measures to incentivise recognition set out in s 40 of the 2013 Act should be commenced, and the Scottish Government and Northern Ireland Executive should consider what further action is required to bring about success as contemplated by the Charter.

The PRP says that “it would be premature to introduce statutory regulation.  The recognition system must be established first and then properly tested”.  However, if nothing is done, then Parliament, the Scottish Government and Northern Ireland Executive “may wish to consider what other or further action is required to bring about success of the kind contemplated by the Charter”.  To access the report, click here.

Topics